
Wednesday, October 18, 2006
But this legislation doesn't require states to implement these plans. That's mainly because the federal government doesn't have the authority to force states to do so. It can do other things to encourage implementation, such as withhold federal aid funding. But then again, how it would look if the federal government held back assistance for healthcare just because the State didn't provide emergency shelter for pets? I doubt the people would stand for that.The reason why I'm addressing this again is because I'm seeing articles and opinions published here and there claiming that states are now required by law to assist pets in natural disasters. WRONG!
While I agree that the PETs act leaves the funding of emergency plans to be determined at the state level, I think it is unfair that you site RileyCare.com as a perpetuator of complacency. The press release cited here appears reprinted with the permission of another authority and seems to be intended as information on current events rather than an actual suggestion of what to do with your pet. There is an entire Disaster Preparation section on the RileyCare.com site which specifically details the steps you can take to help prepare your family and your pet for a disaster or emergency. I think you should do a little more research before decrying perfectly innocent and even helpful organizations such as RileyCare!
By , at 3:57 PM, October 23, 2006
| Post a Comment | |
| Back to Homepage | |
News your dog would want to know about, pet legislation, new pet products, and weird stuff.
Clear Digital Media, Inc.

Steve Johnson
Writer

Mia Purebred

Max the Impaler