|
Home
Dog
Food
BARF - the Raw Food Diet for Dogs
BARF - the Raw Food Diet for Dogs
More dog owners than ever are feeding their pets raw bones
and raw meats. Learn the pros and cons.
by Steve Johnson, staff
July 12, 2004
If you have followed any of the online newsgroups centered
around dogs, you may have heard about "BARF", an
acronym for Bones And Raw Food.
The concept is simple. It's about feeding your dog raw, fresh
foods rich in protein, such as meat, dairy, and eggs, as well
as raw bones, and avoiding the commercial or processed stuff.
The idea is that dogs were meant to eat naturally available
foods, and being the carnivores they are, should eat plenty
of protein.
Dog owners who are loyal to the BARF diet, claim they have
seen remarkable improvement in their pets' behavior, energy,
and mood.
The BARF diet generally consists of raw meat, such as beef,
lamb, chicken, turkey and fish among others. Some dog owners
go so far as to provide raw squid, eel, and rabbit. Many include
raw eggs into the diet as well. A BARF diet may also include
some processed foods, such as cheese, yogurt, or weenies.
Raw bones are also part of the diet, mainly smaller and softer
bones. A common practice is to feed a dog raw turkey necks
or chicken necks. Some people choose to grind up bones with
some kind of meat grinder, and mix other raw foods into it,
such as meat, eggs, or some vegetables.
Proponents of BARF claim that for thousands of years before
commercially processed foods were available, dogs ate the
same food that their owners ate, either as table scraps or
unwanted portions of game. They also cite wild dogs, such
as wolves, fox, and coyotes eating their prey raw, including
bones. To counter the BARF movement, manufacturers of commercially
processed food claim that their products are balanced for
a dog's health, and is actually better because it gives a
dog the precise nutrition it needs. Moreover, veterinaries
argue that while wild dogs do indeed eat raw bones, no one
has any proof that they are not suffering from doing so.
Jane Anderson, who publishes a popular BARF website RawLearning.com,
suggests that feeding an appropriate raw diet is the best
way to provide a solid platform for a dog's health. "You
probably already know that there is no commercial dog food
that even comes close to providing the benefits of an appropriate
raw diet for your dog. And there is no such thing as "quality"
or "human-grade" kibble.", she explains on her website.
When asked why commercial dog food is not good for a dog,
she responds with a list of reasons among them are, "The
vast majority of commercial dog foods have far too much carbohydrates
in them. High levels of carbohydrates are linked to over-eating,
diabetes, weight gain, and numerous other problems. Dogs should
eat a diet with only a small amount of carbs. A dog's food
should never be cooked. It should be fed in a raw natural
state like nature intended. Cooking a dog's food ruins most
of the nutritional value. "
However, T. J. Dunn, DVM, a veterinarian, who runs ThePetCenter.com,
explains on his website that while feeding a dog raw foods
has many benefits, people need to take care to ensure the
amounts and ratios of nutrients are in proper balance. "The
eventual effects of deficiencies, imbalances and over-supplementing
a diet may not show detrimental effects in an animal for months
after an improper diet has been fed.", says Dunn.
When asked about feeding raw bones to a dog, Dunn argues
that there is no clinical proof that feeding a dog raw bones
has any benefit, and questions if that any reported benefit
may come from other sources. "Could it be that the nutritional
benefits seemingly derived from feeding RAW BONES is mostly
derived from the meat, fat and connective tissues attached
to those raw bones more so than from the actual bone itself?"
asks Dunn.
In fact, Dunn's website goes on to report stories of raw
bones lodging themselves into a dog's esophagus and disgestive
tracts. He has photographs
of x-rays as evidence, some depicting cases where bones
have impacted themselves, requiring surgery to alleviate.
In addition, Dunn reports that bone fragments can break off
in the chewing process and get lodged into a dog's teeth.
In one case, he shows photos of a bone fragment that got stuck
in a beagle's molars and had to be removed by a vet.
As a means to end the discussion of eating raw bones, Dunn
published a study of the nutritional
content of bones, and found that "Other than being
a great source of Calcium and Phosphorus, the chemical composition
of raw bones is such that minimal nutritional benefits are
obtained from their ingestion. Marrow does have some nutritional
value but is composed mainly of fat."
When asked about the arguments presented by veterinarians,
BARFers seem to brush it off by pointing out that most vets
are in the pockets of dog food companies and pharmacy manufacturers.
They cite the free food, drugs, and office supplies that veterinarians
receive from these companies as evidence that they are being
paid to promote their products, and to emphasize the dangers
of BARF.
Anderson has published a page on her website explaining the
"Hidden
Link Between Vets, Universities, and Pet Food Companies",
and draws a parallel between doctors in the medical profession,
with that in the veterinary profession. She goes on to suggest
that veterinary students in universities are being misled
by pet food companies. She writes, "Additionally, universities
have been well known for using pet food company sales reps
to present to their students the lectures on nutrition."
Because of this, she feels that many veterinarians are not
thinking independently, and complains, "There is no excuse
for vets not getting themselves better educated."
Is the BARF diet a legitimate theory in maintaining a healthy
and happy dog? Most vets seem to agree that raw foods have
great benefits, but the agreement seems to end with feeding
them raw bones. Moreover, while feeding raw foods is beneficial,
not maintaining proper nutritional balance may shorten a dog's
life instead of extending it.
|